Fact Check and Voting
Learn how your Representatives are voting on environmental issues. Vote environment in the 2026 Congressional midterms.
National environmental Voting Records
National Environmental SCORECARD
FOR PEOPLE AND THE PLANET
The League of Conservation Voters builds political power for people and the planet. We influence policy, hold politicians accountable, and win elections in order to create safe and healthy communities protected by a just and equitable democracy
OpenSecrets
We Are OpenSecrets
Nonpartisan, independent and nonprofit, OpenSecrets is the nation’s premier research group tracking money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy. Our mission is to track the flow of money in American politics and provide the data and analysis to strengthen democracy.
Disinformation Fact Check
Resources for you to learn about how your news and media sources rate on the truth vs dis-information scale.
The World Agrees there is a Climate Crisis. Why not all Americans?
Disinformation is having an impact.
Politifact.com
Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
FactCheck.org
A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Safeguarding your vote
Resources for you to safeguard your vote and make sure it is not disqualified
Early In-Person Voting
As of March 2024, forty-six states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands offer early in-person voting to all voters (this includes states with all-mail elections). Four states—Alabama, Delaware, Mississippi and New Hampshire—do not offer early in-person voting, though they may provide options for eligible absentee voters.
Voter ID requirements
Your state’s laws determine whether you will need to show an ID and, if so, what kind.
Your state may require you to show a photo ID like a driver’s license, state ID, or passport. Or they may ask to see another form of identification like your voter registration card, birth certificate, or Social Security card.
VOTE.ORG
Vote.org is a nonpartisan nonprofit that is committed to advocating for voters in every state, creatively building tech and partnerships, reaching voters where they are and fighting against harmful voter suppression laws in court.
Our unique approach is research-backed and funded 100% by tax-deductible donations from voters like you. Your donation will power our ability to safeguard our democracy and ensure it can thrive into the future.
Recognizing disinformation
REcognizing Disinformation
The most often used forms of disinformation used in climate disinformation campaigns – Chat GPT 3.5
CHERRY-PICKING DATA:
Selectively using data to support a particular narrative while ignoring contradictory evidence. Example: Highlighting a short-term cooling trend to downplay overall global warming.
FALSE ATTRIBUTION:
Falsely attributing natural climate variations or unrelated events to human-induced climate change. Example: Blaming cold weather on global warming to create confusion.
CONSPIRACY THEORIES:
Spreading unfounded claims of collusion or deception within the scientific community or among policymakers to undermine trust in climate science. Example: Alleging that climate scientists manipulate data to secure research funding.
Misrepresentation of scientific uncertainty: Exaggerating uncertainties in climate science to cast doubt on the consensus findings. Example: Emphasizing uncertainty about future climate projections while downplaying the high confidence in observed trends.
FALSE BALANCE:
Presenting fringe views or industry-funded research as equally credible to mainstream scientific consensus. Example: Giving equal airtime to climate change deniers alongside climate scientists in media debates.
WHATABOUTISM:
Deflecting attention from climate change by pointing to other issues or past environmental events. Example: Arguing against action on climate change by citing historical climate shifts or natural disasters.
PERSONAL ATTACKS:
Attacking the character, motives, or qualifications of climate scientists and activists instead of engaging with the scientific evidence. Example: Dismissing climate scientists as alarmists or accusing them of pursuing a political agenda.
FAKE EXPERTS:
Promoting individuals without relevant expertise or affiliations with credible institutions as authorities on climate science. Example: Quoting a non-scientist with ties to fossil fuel industries to dispute climate change.
ASTROTURFING:
Creating fake grassroots movements or organizations to give the appearance of widespread public opposition to climate action. Example: Establishing a front group with a benign-sounding name to lobby against environmental regulations.
DATA MANIPULATION:
Altering or misrepresenting scientific data to fit a predetermined narrative or to undermine climate change findings. Example: Editing temperature records to downplay the extent of global warming.
FEARMONGERING:
Exaggerating the potential economic or societal consequences of climate policies to sow doubt or opposition. Example: Claiming that efforts to address climate change will lead to widespread job losses and economic collapse.
FALSE SOLUTIONS:
Promoting ineffective or counterproductive approaches to addressing climate change as alternatives to genuine mitigation and adaptation strategies. Example: Advocating for geoengineering projects that have uncertain risks and could exacerbate environmental problems.
